The Washington Post
opinion piece, Class Struggle: Why Grade-Skipping Should Be Back in Fashion, created quite a stir in gifted education blogs and forums and in reader
comments. Some of the points writer Jay Mathews makes are that
- a generation or two ago, grade skipping was more acceptable
- students are far more ready to adjust to age differences when skipping a grade than we think they are
- grade-skipping is an economical and effective way to meet the needs of highly able students
- when a student has strong academic abilities in just one or two subjects, that student should move to a higher grade for those specific subjects and stay with his age-peer group for the rest of the day
According to the NAGC Position Statement on Acceleration, there is more research supporting this intervention than any other in the
literature on gifted individuals. Several interventions fall under the umbrella
of acceleration: not only grade-skipping, but also telescoping, early entrance
into kindergarten or college, credit by examination, and acceleration in content
areas through such programs as Advanced Placement and International
Baccalaureate at the high school level.
Australian author and scholar Miraca Gross
is a strong proponent of radical
acceleration for exceptionally and profoundly gifted children. She is well
known for her longitudinal study of students with IQs over 160.
If you are a parent or educator who is interested in
exploring the possibilities of grade-skipping for a student or students, go to
the website for the Davidson Institute for Talent Development and
search on the words grade skip. Also, take a look at the Iowa Acceleration Scale, which is a tool to help schools make effective decisions regarding a
grade-skip.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments will be available after approval.